Why is any safe treatment for cancer still out of reach, despite millions and millions of dollars donated year after year to cancer research? Likewise, over 50 years of Muscular Dystrophy Association telethons has produced no cure either. Data from 2009 showed the telethons for the Muscular Dystrophy Association had raised $2.45 Billion since their inception. By now that is over two and a half billion, dollars ($2,500,000,000) donated to medical research, and nothing but nothing for a cure. Getting back to cancer, each year we are promised that the cure is right around the corner, and that we just have to keep giving more because we're so close. Billions of dollars are just not enough. Their promises have lost all credibility.
When it comes to any breast cancer hope, what good is all the "racing for the cure" when they keep racing in the same, wrong direction? A new breast cancer treatment? Really? Or is it just racing for the donations? The focus of cancer research is still the same as it has been for over 50 years. Nothing has changed. Did you know that the expression "for the cure," has been trademarked so that nobody else can use it? Isn't that because running for the cure, the race for the cure, walking for the cure, the war on cancer, and present-day cancer treatment, and cancer fundraising are such huge businesses?
Billions have been donated for cancer research, and yet there is no great treatment for cancer. Why? Because the cancer research dollars are continuously being misdirected to bogus, same-as-always cancer treatment research. The direction of cancer research depends on the belief systems of the people controlling the cancer research money, donated or not.
When you donate, albeit with a good heart, they control where the money is spent. It never goes to any truly alternative cancer research. Alternative cancer research goes unfunded.
Alternative cancer treatment? Not funded.
The basics of cancer research: Research always starts with a question to be answered, and ends with the results, but when they start by asking the wrong questions about cancer, we get the wrong research every time; year after year and decade after decade. Treat the wrong problem, get the wrong results. Year after year the question is "what is the best drug for cancer?" That is the wrong question about cancer, and because no one is able to be bold enough to ask the right question about cancer, all research money goes in the wrong direction, leading to decades of wasted money, chasing after a misguided and misdirected dream.
"Chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become a very complex, highly sophisticated science, and perhaps the most advanced science in modern technology involving something that doesn't work." - Dr. Sam Chacoua, MD
[...although with lymphomas and leukemias we've made advances]
"By and large, for cancers that are solid and have spread throughout the body, the ability of chemotherapy to extend lifespan, now, as opposed to 50 years ago, hasn't changed."
Imagine if there were a TV news story about people who were dying in Los Angeles, and they all had digestive tracts that were not "safe." Activists with the loudest yappers and just a little knowledge (a dangerous thing) would then demand that something be done! A new diagnostic term "HBOC," is coined by a drug company, who was already developing a new drug to treat this onerous condition. They would even get their new treatment "fast-track approved" by the FDA. All to no avail because the treatments would kill people too, but the blame for deaths would go to the inability of the treatments to keep up with the demand for the treatment, not to the treatment itself. Bigger campaigns get launched. Cries for more treatments are heard on TV. Why? Because "reports" say the problem is getting worse, and the answer could be right around the corner! Soon you would have the war on hereditary bowel onerous condition: HBOC. Next: a race for the cure in a town near you.
So let me ask you: How do YOU keep your digestive tract safe? What is your answer? What are you doing to keep your digestive tract safe? The correct answer is: "Wake up! That's the wrong question!" The original question is nonsense! The original concept was brought to you by a drug company with a product to sell. But asking that question over and over drives the momentum of the misinformation, especially through the hysterical news media, until even you believe it yourself. Do you see how this works? There is no such thing as HBOC. Wrong question, wrong focus, misguided treatment, wrong cures: cures that fail and cures that kill.
Now that you can see by example how this can take hold, let's get back to the original questions that no one seems to be able to answer, despite Billion$ of dollar$ of cancer research money. These questions always start with the idea: "What is the best way to destroy cancer?"
To destroy cancer? That's the wrong question! From the wrong question comes the domino effect: wrong question: wrong cancer research trying to solve the wrong question: misguided cancer treatment: terrible results. That's unacceptable! What about thinking outside of the box? The old and persistent idea of "what is the right treatment for cancer?" which is always interpreted as "how do you kill cancer?" is the most boxed-up idea around. Just think, over fifty years of misdirected cancer research has failed us, despite the multi-billions spent from charity and tax-dollar funded research, because no one has challenged the initial flawed question. It's time to wake up. Cancer research has to change! We need alternative cancer research.
wrong question > wrong cancer research > wrong treatments > terrible results
Now that you know how cancer research and cancer treatment today are out of order, ask yourself the following: Have you ever had an alternative second opinion? Besides conventional cancer treatment, do you, or someone you know with cancer, have an adjunctive cancer care plan for recovery, or an integrative cancer program? Do you have any kind of supportive alternative plan, or something like a naturopathic cancer treatment / complementary alternative integrative cancer plan? Are you or someone you love trapped in the three-sided conventional cancer treatment "box" of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation? Are you praying for a speedy recovery? Are you looking for alternative cancer treatment, but don't know where to look, or are you looking for alternative cancer resources?
Alternative cancer treatment in Los Angeles?
There are alternative-thinking holistic doctors who can work with the bigger picture of your total level of health, and recognize the dismal limitations of today's conventional cancer treatment. I happen to be one of them, and I'm bold enough to tell you. If you want a true adjunct cancer care plan, an alternative second opinion, a complementary care program—something in addition to your standard care—that you could call integrative immunotherapy, or a plan of surviving radiation therapy in Los Angeles, you should contact my office today. But let's be clear before you call to my Beverly Hills Los Angeles location: we do not have "alternative cancer treatment," as does Dr. Burzinsky. Nobody but a cancer doctor can say that they "treat cancer," and we don't "treat cancer," but this mixing of words is part of the problem. Call us today for your appointment.