Los Angeles: Have you read the recent article about a new cancer treatment? There's generally one that pops-up about every month. I received an article titled "Curing cancer: Nobel laureate Hershko on whether it’s possible." I hope my commentary about the article is informative and helpful for you, and for the thousands of people who want to beat cancer and are searching for alternative cures for cancer (excerpts from the article are italicized, below).
"There are thousands of different kinds of cancer, and just one kind, breast cancer, can be triggered by 15 different causes," Hershko said.
This excerpted text, above, is incomplete information, which can be misleading when taken out of context. The missing piece of information is likely due to the reporter's edits, not the researcher's quotes or intent. I discuss this below:
I Met With A Top Cancer Researcher. Here's What I Learned:
When Professor Yoav Henis was here in Los Angeles, on behalf of the Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF), I got a chance to ask him a few questions after his presentation. He is a brilliant man, and it was a very unique opportunity to speak directly with a primary cancer researcher. He studies the mechanism of cancer neo-genesis; how cancer develops in the first place.
I told him that when I counsel my patients regarding cancer, I often tell them that cancer, like a combination lock, needs more than one thing in place before it can be triggered. A combination lock has three numbers. Two are not enough to open it, and the combination has to be in the correct order. His reply was "exactly." And he continued: "but in humans the minimum number would be 4 things. Mice can have 3 [triggers for cancer], but in humans it must be a minimum of 4."
So, here's what's missing from the reporter's words, as mentioned above. My addition follows, in bold:
"breast cancer can be triggered by 15 different causes," butthere must be at least 4 present at one time for the triggers to manifest as cancer.
Do you understand this critical point? If not, read it again. There must be 4 concurrently present triggers of cancer to cause cancer.
90% of Americans Believe Cancer is Caused by Cancer Genes (1)
when, in fact, only 3-5% of Cancers are considered "strongly hereditary" (2)
Taking this conversation further, I asked Professor Henis, "if I were to have ways of therapeutically decreasing the toxic load of a patient (called detoxication in scientific journals), through clinical nutrition, would I then be contributing to the elimination of one of those triggers of cancer that can be part of the necessary combination of 4, leading to cancer?"
His answer: "Absolutely." This has implications for cancer prevention as well as new strategies regarding cancer treatment research and cancer treatments.
I was so inspired to hear this straight from a top cancer researcher. I see this as a true message of hope. Do you get my point? Maybe cancer doesn't necessarily have to be "cured," or killed. I will adress this concept, below.
It was an honor to speak with Dr. Henis, and I am thankful for the ICRF to have brought Professor Henis, of Tel-Aviv University, here to Los Angeles.
Hershko is quite skeptical of claims and expectations of a “cure” for cancer. To achieve that, he says, “We must remove every cancer cell in a patient’s body. If only one remains, it can grow and proliferate again.”
When a reporter quotes a high level researcher, like Dr. Hershko, you may end-up with the reporter's level of understanding instead of the researcher's. One cell does not cause cancer if it alone were present unless all the triggers for cancer were still present. The above statement about one cell producing cancer proliferation is strictly for the theoretical case of a "cancer treatment" doing all the killing of cancer cells, in a body that is already a cancer producing body, where all the necessary triggers for cancer are still present and have not been changed.
However, in cases of compromise to the bio-transformation systems of the body (your own purification systems), your alternative health professional would just have to find which systems are affected, and then re-establish the optimal functioning of those systems of bio-transformation: the "detoxication" systems of your body. Cancer support requires skilled professional assistance. Adjunct alternative cancer treatment options can never be done with do-it-yourself protocols. Never!
Don't you dare think that you could just do this without expert help.
If those bio-transformation systems having been compromised are one in the combination of at least 4 triggers that must be present for cancer to exist, then by reestablishing the optimal functioning of these systems, the body would remain tumor-free, or become tumor-free through its self regulatory systems. It wouldn't matter if there were one cancer cell in the body when the body's next step would be to neutralize that cell, by its own regulatory systems (a drug-free process).
The idea of killing cancer cells is the paradigm that has kept us decades behind in having real progress for cancer treatment. It is a 50 year old paradigm that largely doesn't work, except for a few cancers like childhood leukemia, for which reaching remission is a 50/50 chance.
Fifty years of failed cancer research and cancer treatments show how the conventional goal to kill cancer (cancer treatment) has mostly failed us. After all this time, maybe, we can finally see that cancer need only be taken apart; not killed! The approach I use for my patients in Los Angeles may be considered an integrative immunotherapy. It is a supportive addition, or "adjunct" to conventional or alternative cancer treatment.
In 1969, Hershko started his research on how the body cleanses itself of unneeded and malfunctioning proteins, but his work was largely ignored or dismissed for the next 10 years.
This is the key, and it is not limited to proteins. If not even one of the 4 triggers necessary for a body to develop a tumor-producing-ability is never addressed, a "cure" for cancer is a fallacy.
“People just weren’t interested in my research; they didn’t realize how important it was,” he said.
If a detoxifying system of your body is compromised to some degree, or is "blocked" to some degree, this must be professionally addressed. If only your body were given the right support and the right direction, this could be a huge step forward in deconstructing cancer. By the way, when we say "support and direction," we could never call this a "cancer treatment." But without that support and direction it is like running up a never ending hill; trying to artificially do the job the body should be able to do with the proper support and direction we can give.
Healing Happens, in Los Angeles
This is great news! It is the brightest news you could ever hear about " adjunct cancer treatments" because it says the mechanisms that put cancer together in the first place can be taken apart, and your potential for healing can be put back together (reassembled) by using an adjunct cancer care program. Did you get that? It is not cancer treatment. Adjunct cancer care can help you without huge expenses and without powerful drugs. This is huge!
There are alternative-thinking doctors who can see the bigger picture of your total level of health, and who have an adjunct care system and holistic method that is not a way of killing cancer cells at all; aka "cancer treatment." I happen to be one of them, and I'm bold enough to tell you.
If this makes sense to you, you should contact my office today (Los Angeles area, in Beverly Hills), but in advance of your call let's make it doubly clear: Adjunct cancer support is not for killing cancer cells. It is not an alternative "cancer treatment," it is also not passive care, and it requires your own effort to follow my directions and be successful.
We could start doing this today. Request your appointment.
Call or contact us today.